Automation index

How much of a Ham carver’s job can AI already do?

A carving protocol comes earlier. Thin slices without wasting the leg do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

19%

AI can already do 19% of this job.

#488 / 633

Ham carver

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Pick the leg, marbling and the cure point. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Slice, the hand and the one who wants it thick. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	22%	8%	+1.8
Use it, shrink and the bone. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Event, the plate and the bar rhythm. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The client, the photo and not making a show of it. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	18%	+2.9
Thin for real, and not wasting the cushion. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	12%	+1.7
Total	100%		19%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

27%

#191 / 633

Transcriber

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Audio, markers and the shift. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Transcribe, the one who mumbles and the name. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Check, timestamps and not inventing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Deadline, the urgent and not delivering dirty. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Confidentiality, the hearing and not leaking. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Faithful text, and not inventing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low