Automation index
How much of a Harbour pilot’s job can AI already do?
A chart and a current come earlier. Putting the ship in the basin with a beam wind do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Harbour pilot
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#479 / 653
View rankingHarbour pilot
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Chart, draught and the manoeuvre plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Board, conning and the tug.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Wind, current and coming alongside.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Pilotage, the master and not fighting the bridge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fog, the closure and the yes or no to enter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Get it in whole, and not scraping the bottom.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 10% | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- pilotage
- conning
- draughts
- tugs
- come alongside
- charts
- beam wind
- the basin
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-5021.00· ESCO/ISCO 3152
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211