Automation index
How much of a Headteacher’s job can AI already do?
A timetable comes earlier. The school not falling over on Monday without hiding the clash do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Headteacher
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#152 / 733
View rankingHeadteacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Timetable, quotas and the staff.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Family, the complaint and the one that reaches inspection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Behaviour, the sanction and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Budget, the club and not leaving a hole.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Inspection, the figure and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That Monday holds, and not hiding the clash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- school timetables
- quotas
- behaviour
- sanctions
- school budget
- inspection
- family complaints
- senior staff
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9032.00· ESCO/ISCO 1345
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 733
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149