Automation index
How much of a Health inspector’s job can AI already do?
A HACCP list comes earlier. Shutting the workshop and pulling the batch do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Health inspector
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#273 / 643
View rankingHealth inspector
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Inspection, HACCP and the premises history.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Kitchen, workshop or farm and what is behind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Minutes, holds and pulling the batch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Outbreaks, samples and the lab.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The precautionary closure and the one who kicks off.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That nobody gets ill, and signing the minute.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- inspect workshops
- HACCP
- hold batches
- close premises
- take samples
- food outbreaks
- health minutes
- food hygiene
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-5012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211