Automation index
How much of a Hepatologist’s job can AI already do?
A fibroscan comes earlier. Biopsying the liver and calling the transplant do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Hepatologist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#158 / 643
View rankingHepatologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Labs, fibroscan and the stage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Clinic, the drink and the one who denies it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Biopsy, the risk and not needling extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Antiviral, adherence and the one who quits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The transplant board and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Call the liver, and talking to the family.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- fibroscan
- liver biopsy
- hepatitis
- cirrhosis
- liver transplant
- antivirals
- liver clinic
- decompensation
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1216.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211