Automation index
How much of a Hospital porter’s job can AI already do?
A transfer ping comes earlier. Moving someone on drips and not dropping them does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Hospital porter
16%
AI can already do 16% of this job.
#621 / 653
View rankingHospital porter
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Alerts, destinations and transfer notes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Trolleys, chairs and moving patients.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Theatre, mortuary and hospital stores.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Dealing with families, discharges and waits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Support nursing and bay safety.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 22% | +3.1 |
Shifts, physical load and not hurting your back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 16% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Alerts, destinations and transfer notes
- Trolleys, chairs and moving patients
- Theatre, mortuary and hospital stores
- Support nursing and bay safety
- celador
- camillero
- hospital porter
Sources for this job· O*NET 31-1132.00· ESCO/ISCO 5329
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131