Automation index
How much of a Hydrogen technician’s job can AI already do?
An ATEX protocol comes earlier. Working with H2 without leaving a leak do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Hydrogen technician
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#549 / 643
View rankingHydrogen technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
ATEX, purge and the log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Electrolyser, the stack and the one that drops.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Leak, detector and stopping.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Charge, the tube and not mixing with air.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the station and not skipping the purge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
No leak, and the protocol done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ATEX
- purge
- electrolyser
- H2 detectors
- stacks
- hydrogen stations
- leaks
- mix with air
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 643
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263