Automation index
How much of a Hydrologist’s job can AI already do?
A hydrograph comes earlier. Calling the rise without leaving the village blind do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Hydrologist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#345 / 643
View rankingHydrologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrograph, catchment and the model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, gauging and the one that does not read.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Flood, the alert and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Low flow, irrigation and the clash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The authority, the figure and not dressing the flow.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
If the river rises, call it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- hydrographs
- catchments
- gauging
- floods
- low flow
- hydrology alerts
- flows
- the river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2043.00· ESCO/ISCO 2114
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131