Automation index
How much of a Hydrologist’s job can AI already do?
A hydrograph comes earlier. Calling the rise without leaving the village blind do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Hydrologist
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#339 / 633
View rankingHydrologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrograph, catchment and the model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, gauging and the one that does not read.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Flood, the alert and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Low flow, irrigation and the clash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The authority, the figure and not dressing the flow.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
If the river rises, call it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- hydrographs
- catchments
- gauging
- floods
- low flow
- hydrology alerts
- flows
- the river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2043.00· ESCO/ISCO 2114
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 633
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131