IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Hydrologist’s job can AI already do?

A hydrograph comes earlier. Calling the rise without leaving the village blind do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Hydrologist

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Hydrograph, catchment and the model.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Field, gauging and the one that does not read.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Flood, the alert and not delaying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Low flow, irrigation and the clash.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The authority, the figure and not dressing the flow.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
If the river rises, call it.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • hydrographs
  • catchments
  • gauging
  • floods
  • low flow
  • hydrology alerts
  • flows
  • the river authority

Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2043.00· ESCO/ISCO 2114

Spanish language teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • text commentary
  • writing
  • speaking
  • spelling
  • language rubrics
  • plagiarism
  • paragraphs
  • reading

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 350Geriatrician22%
  2. 351Nature guide22%
  3. 352Ice-cream maker22%
  4. 354Agronomist22%
  5. 355Mining engineer22%
  6. 356Forestry engineer22%