Automation index
How much of a In-house counsel’s job can AI already do?
A stock contract comes earlier. Saying no to sales without leaving the company sold do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
In-house counsel
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#127 / 733
View rankingIn-house counsel
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Contract, clauses and the risk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Sales, the close and not yielding the essential.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Dispute, the procurator and not sleeping the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Board, the memo and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The CEO, the rush and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Say no, and not leaving the company sold.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- commercial contracts
- clauses
- legal risk
- the board
- procedural deadlines
- sales
- not sign blind
- legal memos
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2611
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141