Automation index
How much of a Inventory clerk’s job can AI already do?
A cycle count comes earlier. Matching what is there to what the system says do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Inventory clerk
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#105 / 643
View rankingInventory clerk
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Count, locations and the adjustment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Floor, the gap and what is in the aisle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, shrink and the reason.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Audit, the auditor and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, the blind count and the stopped warehouse.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Match for real, and not adjusting blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cycle count
- adjust stock
- locations
- shrink
- blind count
- stock audit
- gaps
- variance reasons
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 4321
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131