Automation index
How much of a Inventory clerk’s job can AI already do?
A cycle count comes earlier. Matching what is there to what the system says do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Inventory clerk
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#105 / 643
View rankingInventory clerk
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Count, locations and the adjustment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Floor, the gap and what is in the aisle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, shrink and the reason.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Audit, the auditor and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, the blind count and the stopped warehouse.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Match for real, and not adjusting blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cycle count
- adjust stock
- locations
- shrink
- blind count
- stock audit
- gaps
- variance reasons
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 4321
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211