Automation index
How much of a Inventory clerk’s job can AI already do?
A cycle count comes earlier. Matching what is there to what the system says do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Inventory clerk
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#105 / 623
View rankingInventory clerk
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Count, locations and the adjustment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Floor, the gap and what is in the aisle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, shrink and the reason.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Audit, the auditor and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, the blind count and the stopped warehouse.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Match for real, and not adjusting blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cycle count
- adjust stock
- locations
- shrink
- blind count
- stock audit
- gaps
- variance reasons
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 4321
IS WORK OVER?
Tactical analyst
27%
#132 / 623
View rankingTactical analyst
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Video, tags and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Opponent, patterns and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Preview, the dressing room and not drowning them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Live, the tablet and the change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The manager, the ego and not contradicting in public.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is used, and not being noise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tag video
- opponent patterns
- preview
- bench tablet
- tactical reports
- dressing room
- changes
- data noise
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422