Automation index
How much of a Irrigation technician’s job can AI already do?
A controller comes earlier. Watering the block without drowning the field do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Irrigation technician
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#406 / 653
View rankingIrrigation technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Flow, controller and the sector.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Dripper, valve and the leak you cannot see.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Filters, fertigation and the blockage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Field, pressure and the one that does not reach the end.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The drought, the water turn and not fighting the flow.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The block watered, and not drowning it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- irrigation controllers
- drippers
- sectors
- fertigation
- valves
- filters
- field pressure
- water turns
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-2091.00· ESCO/ISCO 6114
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211