Automation index
How much of a IVF laboratory technician’s job can AI already do?
A retrieval diary comes earlier. Identifying gametes without crossing couples do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
IVF laboratory technician
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#611 / 703
View rankingIVF laboratory technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diary, the retrieval and the count.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Capacitation, the sample and the one that is not there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Identify, the double check and not crossing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Cryopreserve, the tank and the one that is lost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The embryologist, the rush and not rushing a tube.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not crossing couples. Ever.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retrievals
- sperm capacitation
- double check
- cryopreservation
- nitrogen tanks
- identify gametes
- not cross couples
- oocyte count
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3212
IS WORK OVER?
Curriculum designer
27%
#157 / 703
View rankingCurriculum designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sequence, criteria and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot classroom, the teacher and what will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Rubric, the marker and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Review, inspection and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The publisher, the deadline and not swallowing a cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be taught, and not dying in the PDF.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- teaching sequences
- criteria
- rubrics
- pilot classrooms
- curriculum kit
- inspection
- publishers
- dead PDF
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351