Automation index

How much of a IVF laboratory technician’s job can AI already do?

A retrieval diary comes earlier. Identifying gametes without crossing couples do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

19%

AI can already do 19% of this job.

#591 / 683

IVF laboratory technician

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Diary, the retrieval and the count. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Capacitation, the sample and the one that is not there. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	22%	8%	+1.8
Identify, the double check and not crossing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Cryopreserve, the tank and the one that is lost. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The embryologist, the rush and not rushing a tube. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	18%	+2.9
Not crossing couples. Ever. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	12%	+1.7
Total	100%		19%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#398 / 683

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low