Automation index
How much of a Job insertion technician’s job can AI already do?
An agreement and a card come earlier. Placing someone nobody calls, and them lasting the month, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Job insertion technician
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#287 / 643
View rankingJob insertion technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Employer prospecting and the agreements.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Go with them to the job and the first day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Follow-up, incidents and the one who quits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Reports, indicators and justifying the grant.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The hard candidate and the employer who pulls out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they stay, and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- prospect employers
- place candidates
- follow up in post
- insertion agreements
- justify grants
- job accompaniment
- workplace incidents
- insertion indicators
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2423
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131