Automation index
How much of a Judge’s job can AI already do?
Sorting the file and a first order come earlier. Sentencing a person, looking them in the eye, and signing do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Judge
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#516 / 643
View rankingJudge
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read, index and summarise the case file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 38% | +7.6 |
Draft routine orders and procedural rulings.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Hearing, examination and adversarial argument.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Weigh evidence, credibility and context.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 10% | +1.8 |
Write and reason the judgment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Sign, own the decision and preside.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 12% | 6% | +0.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Read, index and summarise the case file
- Weigh evidence, credibility and context
- Write and reason the judgment
- Sign, own the decision and preside
- juez
- jueza
- judge
- magistrad
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1023.00· ESCO/ISCO 2612
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 643
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263