Automation index
How much of a Judicial police officer’s job can AI already do?
A warrant comes earlier. Lifting the trail without breaking the chain do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Judicial police officer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#615 / 743
View rankingJudicial police officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Warrant, the judge and the deadline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scene, the trail and not treading it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Entry, the search and the witness.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Chain, the seal and not breaking it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The prosecutor, the rush and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Lift the trail, and not breaking the chain.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- warrants
- the scene
- searches
- chain of custody
- seals
- trails
- the judge's deadlines
- witnesses
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-3021.00· ESCO/ISCO 5412
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141