Automation index
How much of a Key account manager’s job can AI already do?
A QBR comes earlier. Growing the account without losing it at renewal do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Key account manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#166 / 623
View rankingKey account manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Account, plan and the QBR.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Buyer, objections and the one who changes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Forecast, the gap and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Incident, the SLA and not hiding the fail.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Internal, the one who does not deliver and fighting it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Grow it, and not losing it at renewal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- QBR
- account plans
- account forecast
- SLA
- renewal
- buyers
- objections
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-4012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2433
IS WORK OVER?
BIM modeller
28%
#109 / 623
View rankingBIM modeller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, families and clash detection.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
IFC, BEP and trade coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Site, the one who will not open the model, and the meeting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quantities, parameters and the 4D nobody uses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The last-minute change and not breaking the federated model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it can be built, and not over-modelling.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- BIM modelling
- clash detection
- Revit families
- IFC
- BEP
- coordinate trades
- BIM quantities
- federated model
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3118