Automation index
How much of a Key account manager’s job can AI already do?
A QBR comes earlier. Growing the account without losing it at renewal do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Key account manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#169 / 643
View rankingKey account manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Account, plan and the QBR.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Buyer, objections and the one who changes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Forecast, the gap and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Incident, the SLA and not hiding the fail.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Internal, the one who does not deliver and fighting it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Grow it, and not losing it at renewal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- QBR
- account plans
- account forecast
- SLA
- renewal
- buyers
- objections
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-4012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2433
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131