Automation index
How much of a Key account manager’s job can AI already do?
A QBR comes earlier. Growing the account without losing it at renewal do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Key account manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#166 / 633
View rankingKey account manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Account, plan and the QBR.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Buyer, objections and the one who changes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Forecast, the gap and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Incident, the SLA and not hiding the fail.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Internal, the one who does not deliver and fighting it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Grow it, and not losing it at renewal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- QBR
- account plans
- account forecast
- SLA
- renewal
- buyers
- objections
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-4012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2433
IS WORK OVER?
Demand planner
28%
#111 / 633
View rankingDemand planner
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Forecast, promotions and bias.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Safety stock, lead time and the order.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Sales, the spike and the promo nobody flagged.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
S&OP, consensus and the fight over numbers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The supplier who fails and not covering with air.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Neither empty nor drowned, and not inflating the forecast.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- demand forecast
- safety stock
- lead time
- S&OP
- promotions
- forecast bias
- supplier orders
- empty shelf
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1081.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421