Automation index
How much of a Key account manager’s job can AI already do?
A QBR comes earlier. Growing the account without losing it at renewal do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Key account manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#184 / 733
View rankingKey account manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Account, plan and the QBR.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Buyer, objections and the one who changes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Forecast, the gap and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Incident, the SLA and not hiding the fail.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Internal, the one who does not deliver and fighting it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Grow it, and not losing it at renewal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- QBR
- account plans
- account forecast
- SLA
- renewal
- buyers
- objections
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-4012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2433
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141