Automation index
How much of a Key account manager’s job can AI already do?
A QBR comes earlier. Growing the account without losing it at renewal do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Key account manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#185 / 743
View rankingKey account manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Account, plan and the QBR.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Buyer, objections and the one who changes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Forecast, the gap and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Incident, the SLA and not hiding the fail.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Internal, the one who does not deliver and fighting it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Grow it, and not losing it at renewal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- QBR
- account plans
- account forecast
- SLA
- renewal
- buyers
- objections
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-4012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2433
IS WORK OVER?
Site engineer
19%
#598 / 743
View rankingSite engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Setting-out, axes and the level.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Rebar, cover and the one that is missing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Concrete, the slump and not pouring if it fails.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Note, the diary and not dressing the delay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The site manager, the rush and not covering bad steel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That the column is there, and not covering the steel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- setting-out
- axes
- rebar
- cover
- slump
- site diary
- levels
- not cover steel
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142