Automation index
How much of a Kitchen fitter’s job can AI already do?
A 3D plan comes earlier. Doors that shut without showing the misalignment do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Kitchen fitter
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#458 / 633
View rankingKitchen fitter
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, measures and the module breakdown.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Level, hang and the plinth that will not reach.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Worktop, sink and the edge that chips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Appliances, openings and the service visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the tap change and the extra day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Doors that shut, and not leaving the misalignment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- fit kitchens
- level modules
- worktops
- hang units
- plinths
- appliance housings
- sinks
- breakdown
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 7115
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 633
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165