Automation index
How much of a Kitchen fitter’s job can AI already do?
A 3D plan comes earlier. Doors that shut without showing the misalignment do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Kitchen fitter
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#546 / 743
View rankingKitchen fitter
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, measures and the module breakdown.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Level, hang and the plinth that will not reach.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Worktop, sink and the edge that chips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Appliances, openings and the service visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the tap change and the extra day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Doors that shut, and not leaving the misalignment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- fit kitchens
- level modules
- worktops
- hang units
- plinths
- appliance housings
- sinks
- breakdown
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 7115
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141