Automation index
How much of a Kitchen fitter’s job can AI already do?
A 3D plan comes earlier. Doors that shut without showing the misalignment do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Kitchen fitter
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#458 / 633
View rankingKitchen fitter
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, measures and the module breakdown.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Level, hang and the plinth that will not reach.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Worktop, sink and the edge that chips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Appliances, openings and the service visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the tap change and the extra day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Doors that shut, and not leaving the misalignment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- fit kitchens
- level modules
- worktops
- hang units
- plinths
- appliance housings
- sinks
- breakdown
Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 7115
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142