Automation index
How much of a Land registrar’s job can AI already do?
An index search and a first entry speed up. Qualifying a title and owning the folio do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Land registrar
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#116 / 643
View rankingLand registrar
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Review deeds, simple notes and certificates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Cross indexes, encumbrances and graphic bases.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Make entries and process documents.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deal with presenters, notaries and the administration.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Decide appeals and qualification queries.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Keep the folio, the archive and the public record.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Make entries and process documents
- Decide appeals and qualification queries
- registrador
- registro de la propiedad
- land registrar
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-2093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2619
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131