Automation index
How much of a Land registrar’s job can AI already do?
An index search and a first entry speed up. Qualifying a title and owning the folio do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Land registrar
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#116 / 623
View rankingLand registrar
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Review deeds, simple notes and certificates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Cross indexes, encumbrances and graphic bases.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Make entries and process documents.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deal with presenters, notaries and the administration.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Decide appeals and qualification queries.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Keep the folio, the archive and the public record.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Make entries and process documents
- Decide appeals and qualification queries
- registrador
- registro de la propiedad
- land registrar
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-2093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2619
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 623
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263