Automation index

How much of a Land registrar’s job can AI already do?

An index search and a first entry speed up. Qualifying a title and owning the folio do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

28%

AI can already do 28% of this job.

#116 / 623

Land registrar

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Review deeds, simple notes and certificates. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Cross indexes, encumbrances and graphic bases. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Make entries and process documents. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	22%	+4
Deal with presenters, notaries and the administration. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	18%	+2.9
Decide appeals and qualification queries. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Keep the folio, the archive and the public record. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

26%

#213 / 623

NGO programme officer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Design, indicators and the report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
Justify, invoices and the donor. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	16%	+2.9
Partners, meetings and coordination. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That it works, and not inflating the indicator. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low