Automation index
How much of a Landscape architect’s job can AI already do?
A planting plan comes earlier. A garden you can live in that does not die in August do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Landscape architect
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#282 / 643
View rankingLandscape architect
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, species and the irrigation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Works, levels and the tree that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Soil, climate and not planting what will not last.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Client, maintenance and what they will not water.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
August, the drought and the yes to xeriscape.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is lived in, and not dying in August.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- planting plans
- species
- garden irrigation
- xeriscape
- works levels
- soil
- garden maintenance
- trees
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2162
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211