Automation index
How much of a Landscape architect’s job can AI already do?
A planting plan comes earlier. A garden you can live in that does not die in August do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Landscape architect
24%
AI can already do 24% of this job.
#311 / 733
View rankingLandscape architect
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, species and the irrigation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Works, levels and the tree that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Soil, climate and not planting what will not last.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Client, maintenance and what they will not water.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
August, the drought and the yes to xeriscape.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is lived in, and not dying in August.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- planting plans
- species
- garden irrigation
- xeriscape
- works levels
- soil
- garden maintenance
- trees
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2162
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141