Automation index
How much of a Last-mile manager’s job can AI already do?
A zone map comes earlier. Hitting the peak without leaving the neighbourhood without a courier do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Last-mile manager
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#216 / 643
View rankingLast-mile manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Zones, capacity and route cuts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
KPIs, first attempt and incidents.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
The courier, the lobby and the one who will not open.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Peaks, rain and hiring too many or too few.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The angry customer and not dressing delivered.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Cover the peak, and not leaving the neighbourhood orphaned.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- delivery zones
- first attempt
- delivery KPIs
- last-mile peaks
- lobbies
- delivery incidents
- courier capacity
- cut routes
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3071.00· ESCO/ISCO 1324
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131