Automation index
How much of a Legal secretary’s job can AI already do?
A stock filing comes earlier. The deadline not dying and counsel having the paper do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Legal secretary
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#180 / 643
View rankingLegal secretary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Filings, deadlines and the court.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Appointments, the client and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Copies, notices and the procurator.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Bill, the procurator and not losing the receipt.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Counsel, the rush and not sending the draft.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
The deadline alive, and the paper at court.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- filings
- procedural deadlines
- notices
- procurator
- office appointments
- copies
- receipts
- the court
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-6012.00· ESCO/ISCO 3343
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211