Automation index
How much of a Legal secretary’s job can AI already do?
A stock filing comes earlier. The deadline not dying and counsel having the paper do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Legal secretary
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#202 / 733
View rankingLegal secretary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Filings, deadlines and the court.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Appointments, the client and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Copies, notices and the procurator.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Bill, the procurator and not losing the receipt.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Counsel, the rush and not sending the draft.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
The deadline alive, and the paper at court.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- filings
- procedural deadlines
- notices
- procurator
- office appointments
- copies
- receipts
- the court
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-6012.00· ESCO/ISCO 3343
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141