Automation index
How much of a Leisure instructor’s job can AI already do?
An activity and a list come earlier. Holding twenty kids and nobody getting hurt does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Leisure instructor
17%
AI can already do 17% of this job.
#614 / 653
View rankingLeisure instructor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan activities, lists and permission slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lead the group, games and trips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Handle fights, fears and parents.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Logs, photos and camp report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Kit, meals and nights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
Not losing a child or missing an allergy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 17% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Lead the group, games and trips
- Handle fights, fears and parents
- Logs, photos and camp report
- Kit, meals and nights
- Not losing a child or missing an allergy
- monitor de ocio
- leisure instructor
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-9032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131