Automation index
How much of a Leisure instructor’s job can AI already do?
An activity and a list come earlier. Holding twenty kids and nobody getting hurt does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Leisure instructor
17%
AI can already do 17% of this job.
#614 / 653
View rankingLeisure instructor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan activities, lists and permission slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lead the group, games and trips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Handle fights, fears and parents.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Logs, photos and camp report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Kit, meals and nights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
Not losing a child or missing an allergy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 17% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Lead the group, games and trips
- Handle fights, fears and parents
- Logs, photos and camp report
- Kit, meals and nights
- Not losing a child or missing an allergy
- monitor de ocio
- leisure instructor
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-9032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211