Automation index
How much of a Leisure instructor’s job can AI already do?
An activity and a list come earlier. Holding twenty kids and nobody getting hurt does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Leisure instructor
17%
AI can already do 17% of this job.
#604 / 643
View rankingLeisure instructor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan activities, lists and permission slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Lead the group, games and trips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 8% | +1.9 |
Handle fights, fears and parents.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Logs, photos and camp report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Kit, meals and nights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
Not losing a child or missing an allergy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 17% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Lead the group, games and trips
- Handle fights, fears and parents
- Logs, photos and camp report
- Kit, meals and nights
- Not losing a child or missing an allergy
- monitor de ocio
- leisure instructor
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-9032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 643
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263