Automation index
How much of a Livestock farmer’s job can AI already do?
A headcount and a ration come earlier. The animal whole and the calving coming out do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Livestock farmer
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#420 / 633
View rankingLivestock farmer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Headcount, ration and the health log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Yard, calving and the one that lags.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Pasture, water and the fence that comes down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Market, abattoir and the day’s price.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The drought, the feed and not running them too thin.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The animal whole, and the calving well.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- rations
- calving
- headcount
- fences
- pasture
- abattoir
- health log
- feed
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 6121
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641