Automation index
How much of a Logistics analyst’s job can AI already do?
A cost dashboard comes earlier. Finding the saving without breaking the network do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Logistics analyst
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#79 / 733
View rankingLogistics analyst
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Costs, OTIF and the dashboard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Simulate network, warehouses and the what-if.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Ops, dirty data and going down to the dock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the board and the cut that hurts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The haulier, the contract and not breaking the service.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
A real saving, and not dressing OTIF.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- logistics costs
- OTIF
- simulate network
- what-if
- dirty data
- haulage contracts
- dashboards
- network cuts
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1081.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141