Automation index
How much of a Marine engineer’s job can AI already do?
An engine log comes earlier. The engine lasting the crossing do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Marine engineer
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#515 / 743
View rankingMarine engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Rounds, parameters and the engine log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Breakdown, the sea and repairing with what you have.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Fuel, oils and the port change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Watch, alarms and the one who does not sleep.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Survey, class and not dressing the log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Last the crossing, and not silencing the alarm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- engine rounds
- engine log
- breakdowns at sea
- watches
- class
- fuels
- engine-room alarms
- repair on passage
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-5031.00· ESCO/ISCO 3151
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141