IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Materials engineer’s job can AI already do?

A tensile curve comes earlier. Picking the alloy so it does not fail in service do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Materials engineer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Tests, metallography and the spec.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Shop, heat treatment and the part that fails spec.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Material choice, corrosion and fatigue.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Supplier, certificates and the doubtful batch.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The field failure and the root cause.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That it does not fail, and not swapping the material blind.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • materials tests
  • metallography
  • choose alloys
  • corrosion
  • fatigue
  • heat treatment
  • failure analysis
  • batch certificates

Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149

Curriculum designer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Sequence, criteria and the kit.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Pilot classroom, the teacher and what will not fit.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Rubric, the marker and not inflating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Review, inspection and not dressing it.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The publisher, the deadline and not swallowing a cut.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That it can be taught, and not dying in the PDF.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • teaching sequences
  • criteria
  • rubrics
  • pilot classrooms
  • curriculum kit
  • inspection
  • publishers
  • dead PDF

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 165Automation engineer27%
  2. 166Energy engineer27%
  3. 167Packaging engineer27%
  4. 169Renewables engineer27%
  5. 170Hydraulic engineer27%
  6. 171Textile engineer27%