IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Materials engineer’s job can AI already do?

A tensile curve comes earlier. Picking the alloy so it does not fail in service do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Materials engineer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Tests, metallography and the spec.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Shop, heat treatment and the part that fails spec.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Material choice, corrosion and fatigue.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Supplier, certificates and the doubtful batch.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The field failure and the root cause.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That it does not fail, and not swapping the material blind.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • materials tests
  • metallography
  • choose alloys
  • corrosion
  • fatigue
  • heat treatment
  • failure analysis
  • batch certificates

Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149

Instructional designer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Aim, the storyboard and the module.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Pilot, the learner and what is not understood.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Activity, the feedback and not putting a silly test.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
LMS, the figure and not inflating completion.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The client, the deadline and not cutting the practice.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That they learn, and not leaving the empty video.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • course storyboard
  • modules
  • learner pilot
  • activities
  • LMS
  • completion
  • feedback
  • not a silly test

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 171Automation engineer27%
  2. 172Energy engineer27%
  3. 173Packaging engineer27%
  4. 175Renewables engineer27%
  5. 176Hydraulic engineer27%
  6. 177Textile engineer27%