Automation index
How much of a Materials engineer’s job can AI already do?
A tensile curve comes earlier. Picking the alloy so it does not fail in service do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Materials engineer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#162 / 633
View rankingMaterials engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Tests, metallography and the spec.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Shop, heat treatment and the part that fails spec.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Material choice, corrosion and fatigue.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Supplier, certificates and the doubtful batch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The field failure and the root cause.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not fail, and not swapping the material blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- materials tests
- metallography
- choose alloys
- corrosion
- fatigue
- heat treatment
- failure analysis
- batch certificates
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149
IS WORK OVER?
Job insertion technician
24%
#282 / 633
View rankingJob insertion technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Employer prospecting and the agreements.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Go with them to the job and the first day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Follow-up, incidents and the one who quits.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Reports, indicators and justifying the grant.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The hard candidate and the employer who pulls out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they stay, and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- prospect employers
- place candidates
- follow up in post
- insertion agreements
- justify grants
- job accompaniment
- workplace incidents
- insertion indicators
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2423