IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Materials engineer’s job can AI already do?

A tensile curve comes earlier. Picking the alloy so it does not fail in service do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Materials engineer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Tests, metallography and the spec.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Shop, heat treatment and the part that fails spec.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Material choice, corrosion and fatigue.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Supplier, certificates and the doubtful batch.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The field failure and the root cause.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That it does not fail, and not swapping the material blind.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • materials tests
  • metallography
  • choose alloys
  • corrosion
  • fatigue
  • heat treatment
  • failure analysis
  • batch certificates

Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149

Reliability engineer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • MTBF
  • Pareto
  • root causes
  • critical spares
  • RCM
  • failures
  • maintenance plans
  • not patch twice

Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 173Energy engineer27%
  2. 174Packaging engineer27%
  3. 175Reliability engineer27%
  4. 177Renewables engineer27%
  5. 178Traffic engineer27%
  6. 179Hydraulic engineer27%