Automation index
How much of a Medical secretary’s job can AI already do?
A clinic diary comes earlier. The patient going in and the record being there do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Medical secretary
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#177 / 633
View rankingMedical secretary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diary, appointments and the DNA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Record, the report and the missing one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Phone, results and not giving them wrong.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The doctor, the delay and not wrecking the waiting room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Confidentiality and not talking in the corridor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
The patient goes in, and the record is there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- clinic diary
- records
- results
- confidentiality
- waiting room
- medical appointments
- reports
- DNAs
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-6013.00· ESCO/ISCO 3344
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
#57 / 633
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632