Automation index
How much of a Medical secretary’s job can AI already do?
A clinic diary comes earlier. The patient going in and the record being there do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Medical secretary
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#177 / 623
View rankingMedical secretary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Diary, appointments and the DNA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Record, the report and the missing one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Phone, results and not giving them wrong.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The doctor, the delay and not wrecking the waiting room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Confidentiality and not talking in the corridor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
The patient goes in, and the record is there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- clinic diary
- records
- results
- confidentiality
- waiting room
- medical appointments
- reports
- DNAs
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-6013.00· ESCO/ISCO 3344
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142