IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Merchandiser’s job can AI already do?

A planogram comes earlier. A shelf that sells without looking empty do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Merchandiser

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Planogram, facings and the shelf.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Store, replenish and the one who will not follow the plan.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Promo, the extra and the one that falls.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Data, sell-out and not inflating facings.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The store manager, the space and fighting for the gap.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That the shelf sells, and not empty.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • planograms
  • facings
  • the shelf
  • sell-out
  • promos
  • replenish
  • store space
  • gaps

Sources for this job· O*NET 41-9011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5223

Football coach

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Lineup, plan and the opponent clip.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Train, the one who is late and the one who hides.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Match, the changes and the one who boils.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Dressing room, the ego and not losing the group.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
The board, the parents and not picking the son under pressure.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
Compete, and not breaking.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • lineups
  • opponent clip
  • training
  • changes
  • dressing room
  • parents
  • pick the side
  • match plan

Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 3422

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 350Primary school teacher22%
  2. 351Doctor22%
  3. 352Gastroenterologist22%
  4. 354Microbiologist22%
  5. 355Miller22%
  6. 356Notary22%