Automation index
How much of a Miller’s job can AI already do?
A mill diagram comes earlier. Regular flour without scorching the grain do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Miller
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#419 / 743
View rankingMiller
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Wheat, moisture and the diagram.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Mill, sift and the one that heats.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Quality, ash and the baker who complains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Cleaning, pests and the silo.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The harvest, the batch and not mixing the wet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Regular flour, and not scorching the grain.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- mill wheat
- sift
- grain moisture
- ash
- silos
- mill pests
- mill diagrams
- flour batches
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9021.00· ESCO/ISCO 8160
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 743
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149